The pandemic and pay: a hot investor topic
Remuneration is a priority in our latest quarterly report on responsible investing
2 min read
04 Oct 2021Non-Fungible Tokens are the latest hot trend but are they worth the time it takes to understand them?4 min
27 Sep 2021Markets traded around three themes in August: inflation, timing of central bank stimulus reduction and more moderate growth3 min
Research shows wider benefits of positive pandemic response
We vote and engage with companies in partnership with EOS at Federated Hermes (EOS), which works with businesses on behalf of investors to encourage responsible behaviours. EOS represents investors in 14 countries with approximately £915 billion in assets under advice (as at 30 June 2020).
In their latest quarterly report, Amy Wilson, their sector lead for retail, writes: “Companies that lay off workers after taking government hand-outs are being closely scrutinised by investors and the public. Some criticism has been levelled at those that have benefited via taxpayer-funded bailouts or furlough schemes, particularly if they spent their pre-crisis years splurging on share buybacks.”
She also stressed that those companies that have handled the pandemic well should emerge “stronger and more resilient”.
“Academic research by Harvard Business School and State Street Associates has suggested that those companies perceived more positively by the public due to the way they respond to the pandemic have exhibited higher institutional investor money flows and less negative returns than their competitors,” she says.
Coutts latest responsible investing record
Key findings from the EOS report on Coutts voting and engagement activity over the second quarter of the year include:
- voting against management (of the companies we invest in) or abstaining at just under half the shareholder meetings in which we took part (47.3%)
- having direct discussions with companies to influence their behaviour – outside of shareholder meetings – with 80 companies in our portfolios on 268 ESG issues
- globally, 46.2% of our votes against management concerned remuneration, and 17.1% were about board structure
The difference between voting and engagement
Voting – as owners of shares, we have the right to vote at company shareholder meetings. We can use our votes to support policies that address our clients’ ESG concerns or oppose those that act against them.
Engagement – ongoing dialogue between shareholders and the directors of a company to influence their behaviour.
Example: We might engage with an oil company by having regular discussions with them on setting ambitious targets to lower their carbon emissions. And then we might vote ‘yes’ on a shareholder resolution that proposes the company explains how its strategy is consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change.
Definition from the Principles of Responsible Investment: “Engagement and voting practices are interlinked and feed into each other. Investors might start a dialogue with companies before the voting season in relation to particularly contentious items on remuneration, board structure or shareholder rights, and then start a more in-depth engagement to achieve a required change in corporate governance.”
FIND OUT MORE
See our Sustainability Report 2020 for a quick, easy guide to responsible investing at Coutts. If you’d like to discuss what it means for you in more detail, or find out more about our voting and engagement record, please contact your private banker.
OUR VOTING AND ENGAGEMENT IN NUMBERS, Q2 2020
When investing, past performance should not be taken as a guide to future performance. The value of investments, and the income from them, can go down as well as up, and you may not recover the amount of your original investment.
About Coutts investments
With unstinting focus on client objectives and capital preservation, Coutts Investments provide high-touch investment expertise that centres on diversified solutions and a service-led approach to portfolio management.Discover more about Coutts investments