Investing

Taking stock: Why we’re reducing our investment in equities

Our policy indicator is pointing to a tightening of financial conditions. We believe this represents a headwind for risk assets and so we are trimming our equity overweight and reallocating toward bonds.

By Lilian Chovin, Head of Asset Allocation

  • Our investment process is signalling a more balanced phase of the cycle. Policy is becoming less supportive and financial conditions are gradually tightening, reducing some of the tailwinds that have supported equities.
  • We are therefore trimming our equity overweight and reallocating toward bonds. Within equities, we are reducing our US exposure to slightly below benchmark weight. We are also closing our overweight to domestically oriented cyclical stocks in the UK and returning to our benchmark weight.
  • Bonds now offer a more attractive balance of risk and return. Higher yields improve forward-looking returns and restore some defensive value, particularly if economic growth disappoints or geopolitical risk escalates. Our reallocation to bonds is therefore both a risk-reduction step and an opportunity to capture more attractive yields.

Global equities have continued to benefit from resilient economic growth, solid earnings, and enthusiasm around artificial intelligence (AI), despite a challenging geopolitical backdrop. However, our investment process, which analyses the business cycle through indicators such as expected changes in GDP growth, inflation trends, and policy actions, is now sending a more cautious signal. Policy is becoming less supportive, financial conditions are tightening, and the reward for holding equities has become slightly less attractive.

Importantly, we still see economic growth ahead, and no recession on the horizon, and so we remain overweight equities relative to our benchmarks. We do not see today’s environment as a repeat of 2022, when severe inflation and policy shocks forced a rapid and synchronised tightening cycle around the world, pressurising both equities and bonds. In contrast markets have this year moved from expecting easier policy from central banks to pricing a higher-for-longer interest rate path, creating a headwind for equity valuations, cyclical assets, and long-duration growth sectors — particularly in the US, where valuations are already elevated relative to historical averages.

Balanced response to new policy signals

Our response is deliberately balanced. The cycle remains sufficiently constructive to stay overweight equities but is no longer strong enough to justify the same level of risk.

We are therefore trimming our equity overweight and reallocating toward bonds. Within equities, we are reducing our US exposure to slightly below benchmark weight.

We are also closing our overweight to domestically-oriented cyclical stocks in the UK — including industrials, consumer discretionary and financials — and returning to our benchmark weight.

Bonds now offer a more attractive balance of risk and return. Higher yields improve forward-looking returns and restore some defensive value, particularly if economic growth disappoints or geopolitical risk escalates. Our reallocation to bonds is therefore both a risk-reduction step and an opportunity to capture more attractive yields.

The value of investments, and the income from them, can fall as well as rise and you may not get back what you put in. Past performance should not be taken as a guide to future performance. You should continue to hold cash for your short-term needs. This article should not be taken as advice.

Monetary policy is no longer a tailwind

Our investment process captures shifts in the expected stance of monetary policy by combining market-implied rate expectations with central bank balance sheet dynamics. It is designed to identify meaningful changes in the policy backdrop before they are fully reflected in economic data or actual central bank decisions.

Through this process, we have seen a clear change since March. Through late 2025 and early 2026, interest rate expectations were relatively stable, supported by resilient economic growth and disinflation. That changed after the outbreak of the Middle East crisis and the associated energy shock, which pushed expectations for interest rates in the US meaningfully higher.

Source: Bloomberg, Macrobond, Coutts. Data accurate as at 16/06/2026.

Those expectations have remained elevated even as geopolitical tensions have shown some signs of easing. This suggests the repricing is not simply a temporary reaction to the conflict, but a more durable shift in the policy backdrop, with investors now expecting interest rates to remain higher for longer. Resilient US economic growth and labour market data have reinforced the move by reducing the urgency for the US Federal Reserve to cut interest rates.

Why it matters: two transmission channels

Policy is best understood as a transmission mechanism rather than a standalone market driver. Tighter policy expectations feed through to portfolios through two main channels.

The first is the growth channel. When markets price a more restrictive policy path, the cost of capital rises, credit conditions tighten and the growth cycle can begin to mature. This does not imply an imminent recession, but it does make the backdrop less supportive for broad equity risk.

Source: OECD, Bloomberg, Macrobond, Coutts. Data accurate as at 16/06/2026.

The second is the rates channel. Forecasts of higher rates in the future lift yields across the curve through the expectations mechanism. This directly affects rate-sensitive and long-duration assets, where valuations depend heavily on earnings expected further into the future. Technology and communication services are particularly exposed to this dynamic, which is one reason we are reducing US equity risk.

Source: Bloomberg, Macrobond, Coutts. Data accurate as at 16/06/2026.

What caused the shift?

The catalyst for the recent change in market dynamics has been the Middle East conflict and associated energy shock. Higher geopolitical risk has lifted the risk premium in energy markets and raised concerns around supply disruption. Higher energy prices feed quickly into headline inflation and can delay the disinflation process that markets and central banks had expected.

Central banks do not need inflation to re-accelerate dramatically to become more cautious. If stronger economic growth, stimulated by AI capex and energy prices keep inflation sticky, policymakers have less room to cut rates. Consequently, markets have moved from pricing a smoother easing cycle to expecting a more prolonged pause, perhaps even rate hikes.

Our interpretation: a headwind, not a crisis

We do not see this as a time to go underweight risk assets. Economic growth remains consistent with expansion and corporate earnings continue to be resilient. Inflation is under pressure from energy, but it does not look like a broad-based 2022-style shock.

However, a tightening policy regime changes the balance of probabilities. Equities can still perform if earnings growth remains strong, but valuation expansion becomes harder when discount rates rise and liquidity becomes less abundant. That justifies being more selective and reducing overall portfolio risk.

This is particularly relevant for US equities. The US market has higher concentration, greater exposure to long-duration growth stocks and more demanding valuations than many other regions. At the same time, US earnings momentum has deteriorated, with margins under pressure from tariffs, input costs, and foreign exchange, leading to weaker earnings beats and more negative estimate revisions. By contrast, the relative earnings picture has improved in emerging markets, where AI-related capital expenditure and structural tailwinds are supporting stronger earnings growth. We have recently increased our overweight to emerging market equities.

The cycle has not broken, but it has become less forgiving

Economic growth and earnings remain constructive, which supports staying overweight risk assets. But tighter financial conditions, higher yields and a less supportive policy impulse reduce the potential compensation for taking the same level of risk.

That is why we are lowering risk in a measured way. Tighter financial conditions are not necessarily sinister for equity markets, but they are a headwind. In this environment, prudence means improving diversification and being more selective. 

scroll to top