Our risk management process was designed to ensure we take risk in a way that is commensurate with our conviction levels, but also with our appetite and ability to sustain inevitable drawdowns.
In that regard, one important tool in our arsenal is scenario analysis, which entails looking at past events and hypothetical scenarios to estimate how our portfolios might perform. We routinely use this to inform investment decisions and accept higher risks if our research finds that we should be compensated for doing so.
This approach has previously benefitted our holdings. In April, market losses were in line with what we had anticipated in a worst-case tariff scenario. We ensure our portfolios are rigorously diversified to help us mitigate drawdowns and keep inevitable portfolio losses in downturns within proscribed limits.
During the rising geopolitical tensions over the summer, for example, we analysed the potential market impact of the conflict in the Middle East. Our research told us that losses to our portfolios would be within our acceptable levels given our base case for economic and earnings growth to keep driving risk assets higher. As a result, we made no changes to our positioning, which has so far supported our performance.
Past performance should not be taken as a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them can fall as well as rise and you may not get back what you put in.